抽象的

Public credibility evaluation of scientific and technological organizations based on analytic hierarchy process

Tian Si


To evaluate the public credibility of scientific and technological organizations (taking Zhejiang Province China as an example), the evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was constructed. Qualified organizations were screened in 4 aspects: organization administration and capacity building, infrastructures, business activities and performance, and social impact. An evaluation indicator system was constructed with 16 evaluation indicators, covering the qualities of information transparency, organization institution, technical service, and evaluation by government and business administration authorities. The comprehensive evaluation was performed by means of AHP and using the established evaluation indicator system. The results showed that the focus of improving the public credibility of scientific and technological organizations in Zhejiang Province lies in improving institution, information transparency, technical service and training, and evaluation from government and business administration authorities. Moreover, some countermeasures are proposed


免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证

索引于

  • 中国社会科学院
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 宇宙IF
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
  • 学术文章影响因子(SAJI))
  • ICMJE

查看更多

期刊国际标准号

期刊 h 指数

Flyer