抽象的

The need tomake wind and solar energy numbers right

A.Parker


The latest comment by G. Wagner, T. Kåberger, S. Olai, M. Oppenheimer, K. Rittenhouse & T. Sterner of title “Energy policy: Push renewables to spur carbon pricing” published on Nature September 3, 2015 (Ref.[1]) reveals once more the lack of any understanding of the actual limitations and opportunities of the “fancy” renewable energy sources to reduce the use of carbon and hydrocarbon fuels. This lack of understanding is very well exemplified by the caption “Solar energy provides 50% of electricity in Germany when the sun is out and demand is low” below the image of a residential installation of photovoltaic solar panels, in a paperexclusively focused on wind and solar, that are wrongly claimed to be effective and cheap as these are not now and will never be. The paper show the need to make the renewable energy number correct, as it may be understood by taking into account basic energy availability and conversion principles plus having a look at the energy statistic without covering both eyes.


免责声明: 此摘要通过人工智能工具翻译,尚未经过审核或验证

索引于

  • 中国社会科学院
  • 谷歌学术
  • 打开 J 门
  • 中国知网(CNKI)
  • 引用因子
  • 宇宙IF
  • 电子期刊图书馆
  • 研究期刊索引目录 (DRJI)
  • 秘密搜索引擎实验室
  • ICMJE

查看更多

期刊国际标准号

期刊 h 指数

Flyer